Benjam,on the topic of  PHP, Usability
06.23.2011   |   0comment

I have a flat MPTT (also called a nested set) array (really any tree ordered array will work, not necessarily an MPTT array) which has it’s elements output in order as follows:

  • Top Parent 1
  • Child 1-1
  • Child 1-2
  • Sub-Child 1-2-1
  • Sub-Child 1-2-2
  • Child 1-3
  • Top Parent 2
  • Child 2-1

Each element is it’s own entry in the one dimensional array. This makes outputting that data in any kind of readable form very difficult, where keeping track of parents and branches are required in order to make sense of it. This gets pretty messy, pretty quickly. And the deeper the tree, the more complicated the process.

To make this easier to deal with, the array should be built in a tree format as follows:

  • Top Parent 1
    • Child 1-1
    • Child 1-2
      • Sub-Child 1-2-1
      • Sub-Child 1-2-2
    • Child 1-3
  • Top Parent 2
    • Child 2-1

Where the children of the elements in the tree are actually children of the elements in the array.

In order to do this quickly and painlessly, we are going to parse through this array twice… no iterations, just a couple of foreach loops and we’ll get our tree exactly how we want it.

In order to do this, we must first make sure our array indexes are the same as the IDs of the items we are sorting (because we are pulling this from a database, right?).

To do this in CakePHP we run it through the Set::combine function like so:
Set::combine($tree_data, '/Model/id', '/.');

If you are not using CakePHP, you can create a new array, and as you foreach through your original array, set elements in the new array accordingly:

$old_tree_data = $tree_data;
$tree_data = array( );
foreach ($old_tree_data as $node) {
	$tree_data[$node['Model']['id']] = $node;
}

Now that we have our array indexes set to our model ID, we can proceed.

The trick to this method is not to move the nodes around, because if we did that, we’d still have to keep track of what went where, and that’s exactly what we’re trying to avoid. Instead, we’re going to use references to keep track of our data as it gets moved around. That way we still have our original base array element that we can play with without having to know where it actually is in the tree.

Here is the code, and then we’ll go through it and explain.

foreach ($tree_data as $key => $node) {
	if ( ! $node['Model']['parent_id']) {
		continue;
	}

	if ( ! isset($tree_data[$node['Model']['parent_id']]['Child']) {
		$tree_data[$node['Model']['parent_id']]['Child'] = array( );
	}

	$tree_data[$node['Model']['parent_id']]['Child'] =& $tree_data[$key];
}

Now to explain… We parse through the array and for each element, we first test the element to see if it has a parent, if it does not, we just skip it, there’s no need to go further.

We then check and see if the parent element has an index called ‘Child’ and if it does not, we create one and set it as an array.

Then we do the magic. We set the next item in the parent node’s Child element to the reference of the current node. We don’t actually move the node. So now if you look at the array, you’ll see two entries for the current node, one inside the parent element, and one that was the original in the flat array.

WARNING: One thing to note here, is that we are not setting it to the reference of $node, but to the reference of $tree_data[$key]. The reason for this is because if the element is referenced to $node, the next time through the loop, the value of $node will change and all of the referenced elements will be set to the new value of $node, and we certainly don’t want that.

The magical part of this, is that no matter where the references end up, the original is still there to be modified. So for instance if I have a branch path with IDs as follows: 12, 5, 13, 14… it doesn’t matter what that path is, I can still access the element with ID 14 by modifying $tree_data[14]. So if element 14 has child nodes, I can place them in the tree by modifying $tree_data[14]['Child'], and wherever that node is actually supposed to be, it will get modified there as well. That’s the beauty of references.

Now to clean up the array, we just parse through it once more, and clear out the original reference nodes (the ones that have parents):

foreach ($tree_data as $key => $node) {
	if ( ! empty($node['Model']['parent_id']) {
		unset($tree_data[$key]);
	}
}

And that’s it! No messing around with paths… no iterative functions… just twice through an array (maybe three times), and it’s all sorted, compartmentalized, and pretty.

If you have other methods of getting your trees into a usable form, please let us know in the comments. We love seeing how other people do things.


Tim,on the topic of  Browsers, CakePHP, PHP, Web Development
09.03.2010   |   0comment

Below are some tweets that I have seen recently that I have found to be helpful.

Smashing Magazine – HTML5/CSS3 Cheatsheet – http://bit.ly/aj0yfA

Ben Ludman – URL shorteners and CakePHP – Snook.ca http://bit.ly/btTmSP

And this site – HTML5 Doctor – I couldn’t track down the tweet that I found it from, but it is a great resource for HTML5.

I looked for some tweets about Magento, but just couldn’t find any that were appealing.


04.16.2010   |   0comment

A friend of ours sent us an email with some information about a cool event coming up called hackUTOS – A Code Festival. It looks pretty cool and it will be interesting to see what kind of things can be hacked and created at this event.

For more information:

Event Website
Facebook Event Page


04.01.2010   |   0comment

This April Fools edition of Sharpening the Blades only has two serious articles and we’ll let you decide on the last one. Luke talks about the Future of Web Typography, Benjam talks about jQuery Methods and Mac, well, Mac is the playful one at the office so he chimes in with his April Fools joke for all you PHP gurus.

Luke, Future of Web Typography
For years typography on the web has been very limited when compared to what can be in the print world. Over the last few years though we have been given more and more tools to help us accomplish good typography on the web. As time goes on these tools will get better and will become more widely supported. There was an article on Smashing Magazine this week that talked about a lot of these tools that are available to web designers. I really enjoyed reading up, refreshing my memory of code I haven’t used in a while, and also learning some new ways of styling type. Read it over, the text on your website will be very happy you did.

Benjam, 20 Helpful jQuery Methods You Should Be Using
While developing a website, I use a lot of tools, both in the creation of the website files (my text editor of choice, file manager, etc.), and within the website itself (CakePHP, jQuery, CSS, etc.), and I’m always interested in finding features of those tools that I might not be very familiar with.  While I have a deep familiarity with the features I use regularly, and a passing familiarity with most of the features of these tools, it’s always good to get a refresher on what I could be using more.  Here is a post highlighting 20 jQuery methods/features (actually 33 methods in 20 groups) that should be in everybody’s familiarity tool box.

Mac, April Fools – PHP Style
This discusses a topic that we often only think about once or twice a year, but it is still worthy of our attention and deserves some practice to improve our skills. Also, while you are there, subscribe to the PHP Developers feed. The main guy, Chris Cornutt, does an excellent job of filtering the best PHP articles.


Mac,on the topic of  Linux, PHP, Tools, Web Development
03.18.2010   |   0comment

I just spent about an hour banging my head on a brick wall with the apparently well known “Unable to create selectable TCP socket” problem, which manifests itself most notably with failing imap_open() calls from PHP. It is related to fd_setsize and a frequent limit of 1024 open files (or at least selectable open files). It is quite well documented that it is some kind of bug/shortcoming in the c-client libraries that underlie a lot of email-related stuff, particularly the UW suite of tools like uw-imap, pine, alpine, etc. as well as the IMAP extension in PHP. I love being able to go Google for answers and find a ton of related content. It is really annoying though when people have been talking about this bug for years, since at least early 2007, with very very few workable solutions posted, or even workarounds.

So, I’m going to do my part: I found a workaround that I think might work very well for a lot of people who run into this problem. It’s biggest advantage is that it is very very easy to try, and has almost no downside, even if it doesn’t work for your particular situation. In my case, I found that Apache did indeed have a lot of files open, including log files for all my VirtualHosts, all the libraries that httpd depends on, files from sites that are hosted there (though it seems to open and close those just fine), and a large buildup of hundreds of entries for /tmp that were open and apparently never got closed properly. In my case, the server in question has an uptime of over 2 years, and while “apachectl restart” runs at least daily for log rotation, it seems that doesn’t really close unused file descriptors. The workaround I discovered was running “apachectl stop” followed by “apachectl start” which fixed the problem completely for me, at least for the next year or two I hope. From over 1600 open files, after restarting Apache fully that way, it only reopened about 325 files. And the imap_open() calls started succeeding as they should.

One last thought before I hop off my soapbox: when you find an answer to a problem, and that answer was hard to find or was not well documented, do your part to remedy that for the next guy or girl to hit that problem, and post your solution somewhere that Google will find it. It makes the internet a better place for all of us, and makes us all more productive. Who knows, maybe down the road you’ll run into the same problem again yourself, and not remember how to solve it until you find your own post from years before, and it will be your own time you’ll save. I fully recognize that a lot of what I accomplish each day is based on work done by others that I have found and emulated, as they say, standing on the shoulders of giants. Each contribution to the body of human knowledge lets us reach that much higher, so when you can, add your bit and as we all do that, it adds up.


Benjam,on the topic of  JavaScript, PHP, Tools, Usability
02.25.2010   |   5comment

Why is coding so personal?
I’ve been noticing that often times, when getting or giving feedback on code, or browsing my favorite programming forum, or just reading posts about programming, that people often get very emotional about their code. I was wondering why this is, and because I am not a psychologist, I’ll just give you my thoughts.

Coding to me is like creating art, and there’s a great quote that backs me up on this:

Programming is an art form that fights back. —Unknown

Because code is like art, I get very attached to my code, as well as my style of coding. My code is like my baby, my something from nothing that wouldn’t be there if it weren’t for me. It’s just a bunch of characters on the screen that, from somewhere in the blue smoke, creates a function, or a game, or a website. I have received criticism on my code (as everyone has), as well as given criticism on other’s code (as everyone has), and those times when I’ve received criticism on my code, depending on how it was delivered, or what was said, it was almost like a personal attack on me. And I’ve noticed a few other coders react the same way to criticisms on their code. It’s like the person who called your code ugly or inelegant was saying that your child was ugly (and those of you who have kids know… that’s a huge no-no, punishable by any means available).

It may be because I think that my coding style is the best, it’s what I’m used to, and it’s the format I use because it’s the easiest for me to get at the information I need as fast as possible. I know this because I’ve tried other styles (sometimes flipping back and forth in the same day), and looking at someone else’s code that uses a different style from me, is often times hard to peruse easily. It’s what I like, and sometimes I have to hold myself back from reformatting code I come across into my own style.

So maybe we should stop thinking of code and coding styles as being “right” or “wrong”, and think of them more like the tool that they are, a means to an end. And the way you react to someone else’s means should be a little more like a suggestion for a different method of painting. Not a matter of fact, but just another tool for the tool box.

To continue the art analogy, it’s like everybody is given all the art supplies in the world, and told to make/paint/draw/create a box. Everyone will come up with a different way of doing it, some will be huge and bright red; others will be small and drawn in pencil; others still might be made of clay or brick. No matter what, it’s the way you chose to do it, and it’s no better or worse than the person’s next to you. You might think so because yours was faster, fancier, more elegant, or more “boxy”; but they might think the opposite. In the end, you still have a box, and so do they.


02.19.2010   |   0comment

This weeks edition features an article about customizing WordPress for beginners, designers who can’t code their own designs and the best way to handle content management systems for sites that matter.

Chad, The Beginner’s Guide to Tricking Out Your WordPress Blogtrickingoutwordpress
I liked this post/entry about WP because it was built and geared for the beginner. Once you installed it now what. I find these type of articles interesting because sometimes they are just so simple that I don’t even think of them. And it helps me to explain or think of other things that I feel our clients may want or need.

Mike, Web Designer’s Who Can’t Codedesignerswhocantcode
Twitter exploded in a debate this week when Elliot Jay Stocks boldly tweeted:

“Honestly, I’m shocked that in 2010 I’m still coming across ‘web designers’ who can’t code their own designs. No excuse.”

The world is full of talented designers trained in a wide array of media, but just like other mediums, the web offers its own constraints and limitations. Knowing how to code definitely gives you an edge, even if you don’t code the site yourself. Image resolution, measurements, typography, and browser discrepancies all play a role in what is possible, and help determine the collective best practices of the web. So does a good architect need to know how to dry wall? Maybe not. What about a fundamental understanding of construction and engineering? Absolutely. How much does a good web designer need to know about their craft in order to build a successful website? What do you think?

Mac, Content Management for Sites that Mattercontentmanagementforsitesthatmatter
I liked this article because it gets right at the core of the cost/benefit trade-off that many people don’t think enough about when building their web site. Either there’s a significant value to the work you’re doing on your site, which justifies spending some money on it and getting it done right, or there isn’t a significant value to your site, so why bother? I don’t 100% agree with them about the WYSIWIG comments, but I’ve never tried to tell a client to assume it would look identical in TinyMCE and on the public site. We’ve generally had to train them to be very careful to keep it simple. Use bold if you want, make some lists, paragraphs, links, and stuff like that, but don’t try and do anything funky or you’ll end up disappointed. Another annoying thing about TinyMCE is that even when you tweak the HTML manually in their HTML view, it often wants to “automatically fix” some of the things you did. I was trying to leave a <br /> or two between a couple of separate lists if I remember right, and it kept either taking it completely out, or turning into a paragraph, constantly leaving too much or too little whitespace, even though the HTML I manually entered would display exactly how I intended.


02.05.2010   |   1comment

Tim, 10 WordPress Dashboard Hackscatswhocode
This is a nice article that shows you how to get a customized WordPress dashboard. The article calls them hacks, but I would call them customizations. One that I have tried and loved is adding your logo on the dashboard page next your blog title in the top left hand corner of the dashboard. It’s a nice little touch that goes a long way.

MikeHow Wireframing Makes Your Website Designs Betterbriancray
The value of wireframing comes down to a simple idea: Wireframing forces you to think about your user interface design decisions in terms of user needs first, instead of in terms of what looks good.” While wireframing requires a little extra effort in the initial planning stages, it pays huge returns in the long run. We redesign less frequently, hit deadlines sooner, and best of all, greatly mitigate scope creep. So take your foot off the pedal, assess your client’s business objectives and user needs, and translate concepts into a tangible wireframe. You’ll be glad you did.

LukeFor Better Productivity, Communicate Lesscommunicateless
I agree with Joel Spolsky in one of Lifehackers latest posts when he says that adding more people to a project will only slow it down. I think this is especially true in web development. Once deep into a big project a web developer knows where things are and how they are related. If you throw five of them at the same project at some point they would end up stepping on each others toes. There is a chance that if things are planned out right each developer could tackle a specific task and then they could put all their pieces together to make the final piece. To do that though a lot of planning and meeting together would have to happen. This will probably lead to more disagreements and toe stepping. For those reasons I think getting the few people needed on the project and keep them there is the best way to accomplish a web dev project.


01.19.2010   |   0comment

This edition of Sharpening the Blades features articles about creating admin sections with CakePHP,  how $(document).ready( ) can slow down your site, and the wonderful things CakePHP can do “automagically.” Hopefully these articles will help you sharpen your coding blades.

Chad, Creating an Admin Section with CakePHPcakephp-admin
I have come across James blog just recently (about 2 months). The guys blog is great. He does so much with CakePHP that it is great to see what he is doing and what he can do. But the reason I suggest this specific post is because it seems to be the first stumbling block that every developer comes across while using CakePHP. This article specifically will explain how to get an Admin section set up and working. I consider this one of the must needed to know things to develop correctly in CakePHP.

Benjam, Don’t let Document Ready slow you downdocument-ready
Everybody wants to have a faster loading website, and I am certainly guilty of putting every DOM related jQuery snippet into the $(document).ready( ) function.  This post showed me that this wasn’t absolutely necessary and gives good examples of when and how to break out of the document ready mentality.

Mac, The Dark Side of CakePHP’s Automagicautomagic-cakephp
I’m not sure I like the title of this article so much as I like the article itself, but it does point out some useful information about the “automagic” things that CakePHP does for you. Some of the things they discuss are definitely features that were designed very wisely, even though the article seems to disagree with me on that. There are definitely some automagic things in Cake that they mention that drive me crazy too though, and I don’t really see the necessity for the seemingly poor decision made by Cake’s developers. My biggest peeve they mention are the behavior it has (or had, this may have been fixed/changed now) for many-to-many relationships (a.k.a. HABTM). It is really a pain in the neck when your relationship table has other data in it, like the date/time when the relationship was added, or by whom, or a quantity, etc.


Benjam,on the topic of  Usability, WordPress
01.12.2010   |   5comment

A few of our projects here at Code Greene required the use of WordPress, and those projects had situations that I have since encountered in a site I built in WordPress for someone in my family. That situation was trying to redirect to a parent or child page when a certain page was clicked on.

I know that may seem a bit confusing, but let me give an example. Say I have an “About” page, and that “About” page has three child pages; “Who I Am”, “What I Do”, and “Why I Do It”. Now let’s also say that my “About” page doesn’t have any actual content, it’s just a container for the other three pages, and I just want to redirect my visitors to the “About | Who I Am” page without ever hitting the “About” page. Well, here’s how I do that.

First we need a page template that we can use for the “About” page that will do all the magic for us:

In a new file in your theme folder called redirect_down.php (you can really call it anything you want, this is what I used), put the following:


<?php

/*
Template Name: Redirect Down
*/

// grab the direct children pages of this page
// (both child_of and parent are needed)
$sub_pages = get_pages(array('child_of' => $post->ID, 'parent' => $post->ID, 'sort_column' => 'menu_order', 'number' => 1));

$URI = get_permalink($sub_pages[0]->ID);

// redirect the user down one level in the tree
header('Location: '.$URI);

How this works is it finds the first child of the page you are on, grabs the URI for it, and redirects you to that page.

Now when I create my “About” page (the one with no content), I set my page template to “Redirect Down” in the template drop down, and voilà, when a visitor clicks on the “About” link, they automatically get redirected to the “About | Who I Am” page, no questions asked. If I had pages under the “Who I Am” page, and it was just a container for those, I could also set my template for the “Who I Am” page to “Redirect Down”, and when my visitor clicked the “About” link, it would redirect to the “Who I Am” page, which would then redirect to the first child page.

To complete the collection… in one of the projects I worked on recently, we had a situation where if a child page link was clicked, we needed to redirect up the tree to the parent page. This is basically the same thing, just the other direction, but also a bit easier to code. Here is how it is achieved:

In a new file in your theme folder called redirect_up.php (again, you can call it anything you want, this is just what I used), put the following:


<?php

/*
Template Name: Redirect Up
*/

// redirect the user up one level in the tree
$URI = rtrim($_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'], ' /');

$URI = substr($URI, 0, strrpos($URI, '/') + 1);

if ( ! in_array($URI, array('', '/'))) {
	header('Location: '.$URI);
}

The way this works, is it grabs the URI given, and simply removes the last directory from the URI. (You could also find the parent ID from the $post data and use that to find the permalink, much like the previous template, but this works for what I needed it to do.) If you have your permalinks set up properly, this should work beautifully. And again, with this one, you can set it on as many pages as you want, redirecting all the way up the tree if you wish.

Hope this helps someone. Let me know if it helped you in the comments below.